Known Issue 418

A discrepancy in the calculation of treay losses can be seen when running CAT XOL analyses resulting in a numbers difference depending on the save by options selected.

Issue ID 418
Summary A discrepancy in the calculation of treay losses can be seen when running CAT XOL analyses resulting in a numbers difference depending on the save by options selected.
Description A discrepancy has been observed in the calculation of treaty losses within the CATXOL engine, resulting in different loss numbers between the "SaveByLayer" and "SaveByUDF" output options. The difference in treaty loss calculations arises from how treaties are processed based on the output option used: * SaveByLayer: All treaties are loaded into the engine without checking the Line of Business (LOB) of the exposure or the treaties. * SaveByUDF: Only treaties that match the LOB criteria are loaded after performing a verification process. As a result, the varying number of treaties processed impacts the calculated reinsurance loss numbers, affecting the overall PostcatNet Loss numbers.
Resolved in Future Verisk Synergy Studio release
Date posted 10/2/2024
Software versions affected 12.2.3, 12.2, 12.0, 11.5, 11.0
Feature set Detailed Loss
Models
Potential for loss numbers impact Yes
Workaround Given that LOB filter is part of the treaty - the save by UDF is the correct one. So a user should save by UDF to get Post CAT net loss numbers for LOBs.
Verisk bug 753006